Knoflookboter vs Kruidenboter
Overall, Kruidenboter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Knoflookboter | Kruidenboter |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 2 |
| Calories | 696 kcal | 565 kcal |
| Fat | 74.8 g | 62.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 47 g | 39.1 g |
| Sugars | 3.3 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kruidenboter has 19% fewer calories (565 kcal vs 696 kcal).
- Kruidenboter has 17% less fat (62.1 g vs 74.8 g).
- Kruidenboter has 17% less saturated fat (39.1 g vs 47 g).
- Kruidenboter has 70% less sugar (1 g vs 3.3 g).
- Kruidenboter is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Knoflookboter lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Knoflookboter
boter (melk), raapzaadolie, water, 3,5% gedroogde knoflook, gedroogde ui, zout, citroenaroma, kaneel
Kruidenboter
BOTERBEREIDING, BEVAT 62% MELKVET INGREDIENTEN EX roomboter imelk, water, 27% peterselie, 2% bieslook luflodiqneder, poeder, conserveringsmiddelen EZ E ut zwarte peper, dragon cayennepeper, oregano, leriander, kenel komijn gemberpoeder, venkelzaad with peper gstextract, nootmuskaat, lavas zoethoutwortel poeder, suiker, voedingszuur (E330
FAQ
Which is healthier: Knoflookboter or Kruidenboter?
Overall, Kruidenboter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kruidenboter has fewer calories: 565 kcal versus 696 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kruidenboter has less sugar: 1 g versus 3.3 g per 100 g.