Comparison

Mettenden vs Knoblauchwurstl

Overall, Knoblauchwurstl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMettendenKnoblauchwurstl
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 347 kcal 287 kcal
Fat 30 g 25 g
Saturated fat 13 g 13 g
Sugars 1 g 0.5 g
Salt 2.8 g 2 g
Protein 18 g 14 g
Additives12
AllergensMustardNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Knoblauchwurstl has 17% fewer calories (287 kcal vs 347 kcal).
  • Knoblauchwurstl has 17% less fat (25 g vs 30 g).
  • Knoblauchwurstl has 50% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1 g).
  • Knoblauchwurstl has 29% less salt (2 g vs 2.8 g).
  • Mettenden has 22% more protein (18 g vs 14 g).
  • Only Mettenden lists: Mustard.

Ingredients

Mettenden

Schweinefleisch', jodiertes Speisesalz (Speisesalz, Kaliumjodat), Senfkörner, Gewürze (Pfeffer, Kardamom, Muskat, Ingwer, Zwiebel), Dextrose, Glukosesirup, Antioxidationsmittel: Natriumascor - bat; Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit; Schweinedarm, Reifekulturen, Buchenholzrauch. 1QS-Ware Kann Spuren von Sellerie enthalten.

Knoblauchwurstl

71% Schweinefleisch, Speck, Trinkwasser 4% Rindfleisch Speisesalz. Gewüre. Dextrose, Glukosesirup, Gewurzexrakte, Ant - Oxidationsmittel: Ascorbinsäure, Natriumascor - bat; Stabilisator: Diphosphate: Konservierungsstoff Natriumnitrit: Schweinedarm. Buchenholzrauch.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Mettenden or Knoblauchwurstl?

Overall, Knoblauchwurstl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Knoblauchwurstl has fewer calories: 287 kcal versus 347 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Knoblauchwurstl has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons