Comparison

Mélange de fruits secs vs Cocktail Picante

Overall, Mélange de fruits secs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMélange de fruits secsCocktail Picante
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group — 4
Calories 479 kcal 564 kcal
Fat 28 g 40.1 g
Saturated fat 3.9 g 4.4 g
Sugars 31 g 8 g
Salt 0 g 2.2 g
Fiber 7.3 g 5.9 g
Protein 15 g 17.1 g
Additives010
AllergensNone listedPeanuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Mélange de fruits secs has 15% fewer calories (479 kcal vs 564 kcal).
  • Mélange de fruits secs has 30% less fat (28 g vs 40.1 g).
  • Mélange de fruits secs has 11% less saturated fat (3.9 g vs 4.4 g).
  • Cocktail Picante has 74% less sugar (8 g vs 31 g).
  • Mélange de fruits secs has 99% less salt (0 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Mélange de fruits secs has 19% more fiber (7.3 g vs 5.9 g).
  • Cocktail Picante has 12% more protein (17.1 g vs 15 g).
  • Mélange de fruits secs has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Cocktail Picante lists: Peanuts.

Ingredients

Mélange de fruits secs

Not available.

Cocktail Picante

Maíz frito, _cacahuete_ frito, sémola de maíz, sémola de arroz, aceite refinado de girasol, sal, azúcar, miel, maltodextrina, almidón de maíz, aroma, especias, potenciadores del sabor (E621, E627, E631, E635), aroma de humo, acidulante (E330), estabilizantes (E461, E415), corrector de acidez (E262ii), colorante (extracto de pimenton).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Mélange de fruits secs or Cocktail Picante?

Overall, Mélange de fruits secs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Mélange de fruits secs has fewer calories: 479 kcal versus 564 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Cocktail Picante has less sugar: 8 g versus 31 g per 100 g.

More comparisons