Matière grasse vs Kærgården
Overall, Matière grasse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Matière grasse | Kærgården |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 2 |
| Calories | 468 kcal | 634 kcal |
| Fat | 52 g | 70 g |
| Saturated fat | 15 g | 35 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 2.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | Soybeans | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Matière grasse has 26% fewer calories (468 kcal vs 634 kcal).
- Matière grasse has 26% less fat (52 g vs 70 g).
- Matière grasse has 57% less saturated fat (15 g vs 35 g).
- Matière grasse has no sugar, while Kærgården has 0.5 g.
- Matière grasse has 48% less salt (1.3 g vs 2.5 g).
- Kærgården has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Matière grasse has the better Nutri-Score.
- Kærgården is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Matière grasse lists: Soybeans.
- Only Kærgården lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Matière grasse
Huiles et stéarines végétales 51% (colza 30%, palmiste, lin 5,4%, palme), eau, sel de mer 1,3%, émulsifiant (lécithine de SOJA), arômes, colorant (bêta-carotène), vitamine B1. Traces éventuelles d'ARACHIDES.
Kærgården
smør, rapsolie, vand, mælkesyrekultur, salt
FAQ
Which is healthier: Matière grasse or Kærgården?
Overall, Matière grasse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Matière grasse has fewer calories: 468 kcal versus 634 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Matière grasse has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.