Kærgården vs Flora salted plant based
Overall, Kærgården has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kærgården | Flora salted plant based |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 2 | 4 |
| Calories | 634 kcal | 713 kcal |
| Fat | 70 g | 79 g |
| Saturated fat | 35 g | 39 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 2.5 g | 1.7 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kærgården has 11% fewer calories (634 kcal vs 713 kcal).
- Kærgården has 11% less fat (70 g vs 79 g).
- Kærgården has 10% less saturated fat (35 g vs 39 g).
- Flora salted plant based has 33% less salt (1.7 g vs 2.5 g).
- Kærgården is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Kærgården lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Kærgården
smør, rapsolie, vand, mælkesyrekultur, salt
Flora salted plant based
plant oils (sunflower, rapeseed), coconut fat, water, sea salt (1,7%), fava bean preparation, emulsifier (lecithin), natural flavouring, colour (carotenes),
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kærgården or Flora salted plant based?
Overall, Kærgården has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kærgården has fewer calories: 634 kcal versus 713 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kærgården has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.