Comparison
Mati Malt vs Chicorée cuisine
Overall, Mati Malt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mati Malt | Chicorée cuisine |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 331 kcal | 128 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 7 g | 6.5 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 4.4 g | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 2.7 g | 0.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chicorée cuisine has 61% fewer calories (128 kcal vs 331 kcal).
- Mati Malt has 83% more fiber (4.4 g vs 0.8 g).
- Mati Malt has 79% more protein (2.7 g vs 0.6 g).
- Only Mati Malt lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Mati Malt
Chicorée 38%, seigle 33%, orge 24%, malt d'orge, glands, figues.
Chicorée cuisine
Extrait de chicorée liquide bio.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mati Malt or Chicorée cuisine?
Overall, Mati Malt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chicorée cuisine has fewer calories: 128 kcal versus 331 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chicorée cuisine has less sugar: 6.5 g versus 7 g per 100 g.