Comparison

Marshmallow Fluff vs Pistazien & Haselnuss Creme

Overall, Marshmallow Fluff has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMarshmallow FluffPistazien & Haselnuss Creme
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 330 kcal 533 kcal
Fat 0 g 33 g
Saturated fat 0 g 12 g
Sugars 49 g 45 g
Salt 0 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0 g 3.7 g
Protein 1 g 7.2 g
Additives01
AllergensEggs, HühnertrockeneiweißMilk, Nuts, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Marshmallow Fluff has 38% fewer calories (330 kcal vs 533 kcal).
  • Marshmallow Fluff has no fat, while Pistazien & Haselnuss Creme has 33 g.
  • Marshmallow Fluff has no saturated fat, while Pistazien & Haselnuss Creme has 12 g.
  • Pistazien & Haselnuss Creme has 100% more fiber (3.7 g vs 0 g).
  • Pistazien & Haselnuss Creme has 86% more protein (7.2 g vs 1 g).
  • Marshmallow Fluff has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Marshmallow Fluff lists: Eggs, Hühnertrockeneiweiß.
  • Only Pistazien & Haselnuss Creme lists: Milk, Nuts, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Marshmallow Fluff

Stärkesirup, Zucker, Hühnertrockeneiweiß, Aroma: Vanillin

Pistazien & Haselnuss Creme

Zucker, pflanzliche Öle (Palm, Sonnenblume 9,5% Haselnüsse, 8,6% stark entöltes Kakaopulver*, Milcheiweiß, 5% Pistazien, Süßmolkenpulver, Sojamehl, Magermilchpulver, Emulgator: Lecithine (Soja); Cashewnüsse, Mandeln, natürliche Aromen.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Marshmallow Fluff or Pistazien & Haselnuss Creme?

Overall, Marshmallow Fluff has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Marshmallow Fluff has fewer calories: 330 kcal versus 533 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pistazien & Haselnuss Creme has less sugar: 45 g versus 49 g per 100 g.

More comparisons