Comparison

Marshmallow Fluff vs Pistazien Streich-Creme, italienisch

Overall, Marshmallow Fluff has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMarshmallow FluffPistazien Streich-Creme, ita...
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 330 kcal 597 kcal
Fat 0 g 40.8 g
Saturated fat 0 g 12.4 g
Sugars 49 g 45.9 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g 2.5 g
Protein 1 g 8.2 g
Additives00
AllergensEggs, HühnertrockeneiweißMilk, Nuts, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Marshmallow Fluff has 45% fewer calories (330 kcal vs 597 kcal).
  • Marshmallow Fluff has no fat, while Pistazien Streich-Creme, italienisch has 40.8 g.
  • Marshmallow Fluff has no saturated fat, while Pistazien Streich-Creme, italienisch has 12.4 g.
  • Pistazien Streich-Creme, italienisch has 100% more fiber (2.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Pistazien Streich-Creme, italienisch has 88% more protein (8.2 g vs 1 g).
  • Marshmallow Fluff has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Marshmallow Fluff lists: Eggs, Hühnertrockeneiweiß.
  • Only Pistazien Streich-Creme, italienisch lists: Milk, Nuts, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Marshmallow Fluff

Stärkesirup, Zucker, Hühnertrockeneiweiß, Aroma: Vanillin

Pistazien Streich-Creme, italienisch

Pistazien 45%, zücker, milchpulver, natives olivenol extra, ungehärtetepflanzenfette(sonnenblum enkernek akaobutter), emulgator sojalecithin.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Marshmallow Fluff or Pistazien Streich-Creme, italienisch?

Overall, Marshmallow Fluff has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Marshmallow Fluff has fewer calories: 330 kcal versus 597 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pistazien Streich-Creme, italienisch has less sugar: 45.9 g versus 49 g per 100 g.

More comparisons