Comparison
Maple butter vs Pannenkoekenstroop
Overall, Pannenkoekenstroop has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Maple butter | Pannenkoekenstroop |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 342 kcal | 43 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 84.2 g | 11 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pannenkoekenstroop has 87% fewer calories (43 kcal vs 342 kcal).
- Pannenkoekenstroop has 87% less sugar (11 g vs 84.2 g).
- Pannenkoekenstroop has the better Nutri-Score.
- Pannenkoekenstroop is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Maple butter
Maple syrup
Pannenkoekenstroop
Suikerstroop.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Maple butter or Pannenkoekenstroop?
Overall, Pannenkoekenstroop has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pannenkoekenstroop has fewer calories: 43 kcal versus 342 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pannenkoekenstroop has less sugar: 11 g versus 84.2 g per 100 g.