Comparison
Maple butter vs Appel & dadelstroop
Overall, Appel & dadelstroop has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Maple butter | Appel & dadelstroop |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 342 kcal | 270 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | — |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 84.2 g | 58 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Appel & dadelstroop has 21% fewer calories (270 kcal vs 342 kcal).
- Appel & dadelstroop has 31% less sugar (58 g vs 84.2 g).
- Appel & dadelstroop has 100% more fiber (3.3 g vs 0 g).
- Appel & dadelstroop has 100% more protein (0.9 g vs 0 g).
- Maple butter is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Maple butter
Maple syrup
Appel & dadelstroop
Appelsap* 67%, dadelsap* 33%, geleermiddel (pectine)*. *van biologische oorsprong.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Maple butter or Appel & dadelstroop?
Overall, Appel & dadelstroop has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Appel & dadelstroop has fewer calories: 270 kcal versus 342 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Appel & dadelstroop has less sugar: 58 g versus 84.2 g per 100 g.