Comparison

Mango vs Schweizer Kräutertee

Overall, Schweizer Kräutertee has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMangoSchweizer Kräutertee
Nutri-Score d —
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 326 kcal 26 kcal
Fat 0.9 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g —
Sugars 54 g 6.3 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 2.8 g 0 g
Additives10
AllergensSulphur dioxide and sulphitesNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Schweizer Kräutertee has 92% fewer calories (26 kcal vs 326 kcal).
  • Schweizer Kräutertee has no fat, while Mango has 0.9 g.
  • Schweizer Kräutertee has 88% less sugar (6.3 g vs 54 g).
  • Mango has 100% more protein (2.8 g vs 0 g).
  • Mango is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Mango lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Mango

Mango, Kartoffelstärke, Natriummetabisulfit

Schweizer Kräutertee

Zubereitung: Zwei bis drei Teelöffel Granulat in die Tasse geben, heißes Wasser dazugießen, umrühren - fertig, : Zucker, Traubenzucker, So Ka Kräuterextrakt (2,7 %) aus Spitzwegerich, Eibisch, Pfefferminze, Thymian, Salbei, rauenmantel, Schafgarbe, Bibernelle, Malve, Holunderblūten, Schlüsselblume, Ehrenpreis, Andorn, Karamellzucker, natūrliches Minzenaroma, Ricoll an ausa angekat Nährwerte 100 ml pro zubereitet Tasse* Brennwert Rente 163 WJ 39kcal 0g 109KJ 26 kcal Fett, davon - gesättigte Fettsäuren Kräitet 1atidit 0g 0C 0g 96g Schuet

FAQ

Which is healthier: Mango or Schweizer Kräutertee?

Overall, Schweizer Kräutertee has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Schweizer Kräutertee has fewer calories: 26 kcal versus 326 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Schweizer Kräutertee has less sugar: 6.3 g versus 54 g per 100 g.

More comparisons