Comparison

Mandel smör EKO vs Butter cup avellana

Overall, Mandel smör EKO has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMandel smör EKOButter cup avellana
Nutri-Score — e
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 634 kcal 629 kcal
Fat 53 g 52 g
Saturated fat 4.5 g 27 g
Sugars 3.5 g 25 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.5 g
Fiber 8.5 g 8.5 g
Protein 23 g 7.5 g
Additives00
AllergensNutsNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Mandel smör EKO has 83% less saturated fat (4.5 g vs 27 g).
  • Mandel smör EKO has 86% less sugar (3.5 g vs 25 g).
  • Mandel smör EKO has 90% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Mandel smör EKO has 67% more protein (23 g vs 7.5 g).
  • Only Mandel smör EKO lists: Nuts.

Ingredients

Mandel smör EKO

Roasted almonds

Butter cup avellana

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Mandel smör EKO or Butter cup avellana?

Overall, Mandel smör EKO has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Butter cup avellana has fewer calories: 629 kcal versus 634 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Mandel smör EKO has less sugar: 3.5 g versus 25 g per 100 g.

More comparisons