Mandel smör EKO vs Butter cup avellana
Overall, Mandel smör EKO has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mandel smör EKO | Butter cup avellana |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 634 kcal | 629 kcal |
| Fat | 53 g | 52 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.5 g | 27 g |
| Sugars | 3.5 g | 25 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 8.5 g | 8.5 g |
| Protein | 23 g | 7.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mandel smör EKO has 83% less saturated fat (4.5 g vs 27 g).
- Mandel smör EKO has 86% less sugar (3.5 g vs 25 g).
- Mandel smör EKO has 90% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Mandel smör EKO has 67% more protein (23 g vs 7.5 g).
- Only Mandel smör EKO lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Mandel smör EKO
Roasted almonds
Butter cup avellana
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mandel smör EKO or Butter cup avellana?
Overall, Mandel smör EKO has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Butter cup avellana has fewer calories: 629 kcal versus 634 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mandel smör EKO has less sugar: 3.5 g versus 25 g per 100 g.