Comparison

Mandel Cranberry vs Barre de fruits pomme-banane

Overall, Barre de fruits pomme-banane has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMandel CranberryBarre de fruits pomme-banane
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 389 kcal 360 kcal
Fat 11 g 6 g
Saturated fat 2.4 g 2.3 g
Sugars 45 g 46 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber 3 g 3 g
Protein 6.6 g 3 g
Additives00
AllergensGluten, NutsNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Barre de fruits pomme-banane has 45% less fat (6 g vs 11 g).
  • Mandel Cranberry has 55% more protein (6.6 g vs 3 g).
  • Barre de fruits pomme-banane has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Mandel Cranberry is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Mandel Cranberry lists: Gluten, Nuts.

Ingredients

Mandel Cranberry

Reissirup, Bananenflocken 20%, _Haferflocken_, Cranberrys 13% (Cranberrys, Apfelsaftkonzentrat, Sonnenblumenöl), _Mandeln_ 13%, Aroniasaftkonzentrat 3%, Oblaten (_Weizenmehl_, Kartoffelstärke, Palmöl), Kokosfett, Apfelsaftkonzentrat, Zitronensaftkonzentrat

Barre de fruits pomme-banane

Flocons de bananes (38,3%), jus de pommes concentré (37,3%), flocons d'avoine (6%) oléine de palme, flocons de mais 15%), farine de riz partiellement hydrolysée (3%), pain azyme (fécule de pomme de terre, eau, huile de palme, maltodextrine, citrate de calcium, pyrophosphate de fer.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Mandel Cranberry or Barre de fruits pomme-banane?

Overall, Barre de fruits pomme-banane has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Barre de fruits pomme-banane has fewer calories: 360 kcal versus 389 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Mandel Cranberry has less sugar: 45 g versus 46 g per 100 g.

More comparisons