Maïs doux biologique sous vide vs Fire pit sweetcorn steamer cobs
Overall, Maïs doux biologique sous vide has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Maïs doux biologique sous vide
Fire pit sweetcorn steamer cobs
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Maïs doux biologique sous vi... | Fire pit sweetcorn steamer c... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 80 kcal | 90 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 1.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 4.7 g | 4.2 g |
| Salt | 23 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3 g | 3.4 g |
| Protein | 3.4 g | 3.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Maïs doux biologique sous vide has 11% fewer calories (80 kcal vs 90 kcal).
- Maïs doux biologique sous vide has 21% less fat (1.5 g vs 1.9 g).
- Maïs doux biologique sous vide has 60% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Fire pit sweetcorn steamer cobs has 100% less salt (0 g vs 23 g).
- Fire pit sweetcorn steamer cobs has 12% more fiber (3.4 g vs 3 g).
- Maïs doux biologique sous vide is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Maïs doux biologique sous vide
Maïs doux biologique, sel.
Fire pit sweetcorn steamer cobs
Sweetcorn (94%), Vegetable Shortening [Rapeseed Oil, Palm Oil, Water, Colour (Beta-Carotene)], Parsley, Salt, Black Pepper, Lemon Juice.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Maïs doux biologique sous vide or Fire pit sweetcorn steamer cobs?
Overall, Maïs doux biologique sous vide has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Maïs doux biologique sous vide has fewer calories: 80 kcal versus 90 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fire pit sweetcorn steamer cobs has less sugar: 4.2 g versus 4.7 g per 100 g.