Maasdam 45%MG/ES vs KaikuCol
Overall, KaikuCol has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Maasdam 45%MG/ES | KaikuCol |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 370 kcal | 50 kcal |
| Fat | 27 g | 1.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 19 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 4.8 g | 5.3 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 27 g | 2.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- KaikuCol has 86% fewer calories (50 kcal vs 370 kcal).
- KaikuCol has 93% less fat (1.8 g vs 27 g).
- KaikuCol has 98% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 19 g).
- KaikuCol has 92% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.2 g).
- Maasdam 45%MG/ES has 89% more protein (27 g vs 2.9 g).
- Only Maasdam 45%MG/ES lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Maasdam 45%MG/ES
Leche de vaca pasteurizada, sal, fermentos lacticos, cuajo vegetal, Corteza de plastico no comestible,
KaikuCol
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Maasdam 45%MG/ES or KaikuCol?
Overall, KaikuCol has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
KaikuCol has fewer calories: 50 kcal versus 370 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Maasdam 45%MG/ES has less sugar: 4.8 g versus 5.3 g per 100 g.