Comparison

Maasdam 45%MG/ES vs KaikuCol

Overall, KaikuCol has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMaasdam 45%MG/ESKaikuCol
Nutri-Score — a
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 370 kcal 50 kcal
Fat 27 g 1.8 g
Saturated fat 19 g 0.3 g
Sugars 4.8 g 5.3 g
Salt 1.2 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 27 g 2.9 g
Additives00
AllergensMilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • KaikuCol has 86% fewer calories (50 kcal vs 370 kcal).
  • KaikuCol has 93% less fat (1.8 g vs 27 g).
  • KaikuCol has 98% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 19 g).
  • KaikuCol has 92% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Maasdam 45%MG/ES has 89% more protein (27 g vs 2.9 g).
  • Only Maasdam 45%MG/ES lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Maasdam 45%MG/ES

Leche de vaca pasteurizada, sal, fermentos lacticos, cuajo vegetal, Corteza de plastico no comestible,

KaikuCol

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Maasdam 45%MG/ES or KaikuCol?

Overall, KaikuCol has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

KaikuCol has fewer calories: 50 kcal versus 370 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Maasdam 45%MG/ES has less sugar: 4.8 g versus 5.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons