Comparison

Almogrote vs Maasdam 45%MG/ES

Overall, Maasdam 45%MG/ES has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientAlmogroteMaasdam 45%MG/ES
Nutri-Score e —
NOVA group — 3
Calories 484 kcal 370 kcal
Fat 43 g 27 g
Saturated fat 18.2 g 19 g
Sugars 1.4 g 4.8 g
Salt 1.5 g 1.2 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 19.2 g 27 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Maasdam 45%MG/ES has 24% fewer calories (370 kcal vs 484 kcal).
  • Maasdam 45%MG/ES has 37% less fat (27 g vs 43 g).
  • Almogrote has 71% less sugar (1.4 g vs 4.8 g).
  • Maasdam 45%MG/ES has 22% less salt (1.2 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Maasdam 45%MG/ES has 29% more protein (27 g vs 19.2 g).
  • Only Maasdam 45%MG/ES lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Almogrote

Not available.

Maasdam 45%MG/ES

Leche de vaca pasteurizada, sal, fermentos lacticos, cuajo vegetal, Corteza de plastico no comestible,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Almogrote or Maasdam 45%MG/ES?

Overall, Maasdam 45%MG/ES has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Maasdam 45%MG/ES has fewer calories: 370 kcal versus 484 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Almogrote has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 4.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons