Lübecker Edel-Marzipan Rum vs Marzipan Riegel ZB
Overall, Lübecker Edel-Marzipan Rum has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lübecker Edel-Marzipan Rum | Marzipan Riegel ZB |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 486 kcal | 490 kcal |
| Fat | 28.1 g | 28 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.7 g | 6.7 g |
| Sugars | 43.3 g | 47 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 7.1 g | 4.1 g |
| Protein | 9.3 g | 7.2 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Nuts, Soybeans | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lübecker Edel-Marzipan Rum has 42% more fiber (7.1 g vs 4.1 g).
- Lübecker Edel-Marzipan Rum has 23% more protein (9.3 g vs 7.2 g).
- Only Lübecker Edel-Marzipan Rum lists: Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Lübecker Edel-Marzipan Rum
Zucker, 35% Mandeln gemahlen, Kakaomasse, Wasser, 2% Jamaica Rum, Kakaobutter, Emulgator: Lecithine (Soja); Feuchthaltemittel: Invertase. Kann Spuren von Haselnüssen, Walnüssen, Pistazien, Weizen, Gerste, Milch und Ei enthalten.
Marzipan Riegel ZB
Edelmarzipan* 75 % (MANDELN* 43 %, Rohrohrzucker*, Wasser, Invertzuckersirup*, Alkohol* 0,9 %), Zartbitterschokolade* 25 % (Rohrohrzucker*, Kakaomasse*, Kakaobutter*, Bourbonvanilleschote* gemahlen) *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft. Kann Spuren von Soja, Milch, Haselnuss, Cashewnuss und Pistazie enthalten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lübecker Edel-Marzipan Rum or Marzipan Riegel ZB?
Overall, Lübecker Edel-Marzipan Rum has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lübecker Edel-Marzipan Rum has fewer calories: 486 kcal versus 490 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lübecker Edel-Marzipan Rum has less sugar: 43.3 g versus 47 g per 100 g.