Comparison
Loading… vs Cioccolato
Overall, Loading… has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Loading… | Cioccolato |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 92 kcal | 386 kcal |
| Fat | 7.9 g | 7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 4.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 61.4 g |
| Salt | — | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 13.6 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Loading… has 76% fewer calories (92 kcal vs 386 kcal).
- Cioccolato has 11% less fat (7 g vs 7.9 g).
- Loading… has 80% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 4.4 g).
- Loading… has 99% less sugar (0.7 g vs 61.4 g).
- Cioccolato has 95% more protein (13.6 g vs 0.7 g).
- Only Loading… lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Loading…
_Fish_ Body Oil, Capsule Shell (Beef Gelatin, Glycerol), Antioxidant (Tocopherol)
Cioccolato
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Loading… or Cioccolato?
Overall, Loading… has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Loading… has fewer calories: 92 kcal versus 386 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Loading… has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 61.4 g per 100 g.