Loading… vs Coffee Creamer Creamore
Overall, Loading… has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Loading… | Coffee Creamer Creamore |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 92 kcal | 552 kcal |
| Fat | 7.9 g | 33 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 29 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 9.6 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 1.8 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Loading… has 83% fewer calories (92 kcal vs 552 kcal).
- Loading… has 76% less fat (7.9 g vs 33 g).
- Loading… has 97% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 29 g).
- Loading… has 93% less sugar (0.7 g vs 9.6 g).
- Coffee Creamer Creamore has 61% more protein (1.8 g vs 0.7 g).
- Only Loading… lists: Fish.
- Only Coffee Creamer Creamore lists: Gluten, Milk.
Ingredients
Loading…
_Fish_ Body Oil, Capsule Shell (Beef Gelatin, Glycerol), Antioxidant (Tocopherol)
Coffee Creamer Creamore
Sirop de glucoză, grăsime de cocos, proteine din lapte, stabilizatori: fosfati de potasiu. politosfati; emulsifianțţi: mono - și digliceride ale acizilor grași, mono - și digliceride ale acizilor grasi esterificate cu acid mono - şi diacetil tartric; agent antiaglomerant dioxid de licu. Poate conține urme de cereale care conţin gluten (grâu, secară, orz, ováz, alac, grâu kamut) şi soia. A se consuma de preferință înainte de sfârsitul: Ni Lot: vez madamtska,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Loading… or Coffee Creamer Creamore?
Overall, Loading… has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Loading… has fewer calories: 92 kcal versus 552 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Loading… has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 9.6 g per 100 g.