Les sables bio vs Tutku
Overall, Les sables bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Les sables bio | Tutku |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 490 kcal | 509 kcal |
| Fat | 20 g | 28 g |
| Saturated fat | 12 g | 13 g |
| Sugars | 34 g | 35 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | — | 2.4 g |
| Protein | 7.9 g | 4.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 6 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Milk, Nuts, Sesame seeds |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Les sables bio has 29% less fat (20 g vs 28 g).
- Les sables bio has 38% more protein (7.9 g vs 4.9 g).
- Only Tutku lists: Gluten, Milk, Nuts, Sesame seeds.
Ingredients
Les sables bio
Not available.
Tutku
Wheat flour (Contains gluten), 3achar, Vegetable oil (Palm, sunflower, cottonseed, rapeseed), Sesame paste, Low-fat cocoa powder 2.7%, Hazelnut puree, Lactose (Milk product), Salt, Raising agents (Sodium acid pyrophosphate , Sodium hydrogen carbonate), Carob flour, Emulsifier (Sunflower lecithin), Flavorings. May contain peanuts and eggs.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Les sables bio or Tutku?
Overall, Les sables bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Les sables bio has fewer calories: 490 kcal versus 509 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Les sables bio has less sugar: 34 g versus 35 g per 100 g.