Comparison

Pocket bingo au chocolat vs Les sables bio

Overall, Les sables bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPocket bingo au chocolatLes sables bio
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 492 kcal 490 kcal
Fat 23 g 20 g
Saturated fat 11 g 12 g
Sugars 38 g 34 g
Salt 0.4 g 0.3 g
Fiber 4.3 g —
Protein 7 g 7.9 g
Additives30
AllergensEggs, Gluten, Milk, Nuts, SoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Les sables bio has 13% less fat (20 g vs 23 g).
  • Les sables bio has 11% less sugar (34 g vs 38 g).
  • Les sables bio has 11% more protein (7.9 g vs 7 g).
  • Only Pocket bingo au chocolat lists: Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Nuts, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Pocket bingo au chocolat

Farine de _blé_ 32%, sucre, chocolat en poudre 20% (sucre, cacao en poudre), huile de palme, graisse de palme, _œufs_, cacao maigre en poudre, _lait_ écrémé en poudre, poudres à lever : carbonates de sodium et acide citrique, sel, pâte de _noisettes_, émulsifiant : lécithines. Peut contenir des traces d'autres fruits à coque, de graines de sésame et de soja.

Les sables bio

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pocket bingo au chocolat or Les sables bio?

Overall, Les sables bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Les sables bio has fewer calories: 490 kcal versus 492 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Les sables bio has less sugar: 34 g versus 38 g per 100 g.

More comparisons