Comparison

Baci di dama vs Tutku

Overall, Baci di dama has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBaci di damaTutku
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 521 kcal 509 kcal
Fat 29 g 28 g
Saturated fat 15 g 13 g
Sugars 24 g 35 g
Salt 0 g 0.5 g
Fiber — 2.4 g
Protein 7.6 g 4.9 g
Additives06
AllergensEggs, Gluten, Milk, NutsGluten, Milk, Nuts, Sesame seeds

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tutku has 13% less saturated fat (13 g vs 15 g).
  • Baci di dama has 31% less sugar (24 g vs 35 g).
  • Baci di dama has 96% less salt (0 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Baci di dama has 36% more protein (7.6 g vs 4.9 g).
  • Only Baci di dama lists: Eggs.
  • Only Tutku lists: Sesame seeds.

Ingredients

Baci di dama

Biscotto 90% (farina di frumento, burro, zucchero, nocciole (10% corrispondente al 9% sul totale), tuorlo d'uovo pastorizzato); ripieno al cioccola - to fondente 10% (pasta di cacao, zucchero, burro di cacao, emulsionanti: lecitina di sola, aromi naturali). Può contenere tracce di arachidi, sesamo, mandorle.

Tutku

Wheat flour (Contains gluten), 3achar, Vegetable oil (Palm, sunflower, cottonseed, rapeseed), Sesame paste, Low-fat cocoa powder 2.7%, Hazelnut puree, Lactose (Milk product), Salt, Raising agents (Sodium acid pyrophosphate , Sodium hydrogen carbonate), Carob flour, Emulsifier (Sunflower lecithin), Flavorings. May contain peanuts and eggs.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Baci di dama or Tutku?

Overall, Baci di dama has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tutku has fewer calories: 509 kcal versus 521 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Baci di dama has less sugar: 24 g versus 35 g per 100 g.

More comparisons