Comparison

Les Crozets au Sarrasin MAXI FORMAT vs Multigrain Pasta

Overall, Multigrain Pasta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLes Crozets au Sarrasin MAXI...Multigrain Pasta
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 4 1
Calories 365 kcal 186 kcal
Fat 3 g 0.6 g
Saturated fat 0.8 g 0.1 g
Sugars 2.5 g 0.1 g
Salt 0.3 g 0.1 g
Fiber 3.5 g 1.7 g
Protein 13 g 4.8 g
Additives00
AllergensGlutenNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Multigrain Pasta has 49% fewer calories (186 kcal vs 365 kcal).
  • Multigrain Pasta has 80% less fat (0.6 g vs 3 g).
  • Multigrain Pasta has 88% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Multigrain Pasta has 96% less sugar (0.1 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Les Crozets au Sarrasin MAXI FORMAT has 51% more fiber (3.5 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Les Crozets au Sarrasin MAXI FORMAT has 63% more protein (13 g vs 4.8 g).
  • Multigrain Pasta is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Les Crozets au Sarrasin MAXI FORMAT lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Les Crozets au Sarrasin MAXI FORMAT

Semoule de blé duri de qualité supérieure, farine de blé tendre des pays de Savoie, farine de sarrasin 17 %, œufs frais des pays de Savoie, sel. 'issu de la filière Apina Savoie. Peut contenir des traces de fruits à Sans conservateur, arôme, sans colorant artificiel.

Multigrain Pasta

Farine de Maïs, Farine de Riz, Farine de Sarrazin, Farine de Quinoa

FAQ

Which is healthier: Les Crozets au Sarrasin MAXI FORMAT or Multigrain Pasta?

Overall, Multigrain Pasta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Multigrain Pasta has fewer calories: 186 kcal versus 365 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Multigrain Pasta has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons