Comparison

Latte Karamell-Geschmack vs Original Latte

Overall, Latte Karamell-Geschmack has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLatte Karamell-GeschmackOriginal Latte
Nutri-Score c e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 55 kcal 407 kcal
Fat 1.2 g 12 g
Saturated fat 0.8 g 12 g
Sugars 8.1 g 40 g
Salt 0.2 g 1.3 g
Fiber 0.1 g 2.2 g
Protein 2.9 g 15 g
Additives15
AllergensMilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Latte Karamell-Geschmack has 86% fewer calories (55 kcal vs 407 kcal).
  • Latte Karamell-Geschmack has 90% less fat (1.2 g vs 12 g).
  • Latte Karamell-Geschmack has 93% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 12 g).
  • Latte Karamell-Geschmack has 80% less sugar (8.1 g vs 40 g).
  • Latte Karamell-Geschmack has 88% less salt (0.2 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Original Latte has 96% more fiber (2.2 g vs 0.1 g).
  • Original Latte has 81% more protein (15 g vs 2.9 g).
  • Latte Karamell-Geschmack has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Latte Karamell-Geschmack

77 % Vollmilch, 14 % Arabica-Kaffee* 5% Sahne, Zucker, Stabilisator Natriumcarbonate, Carrageen; Aroma. *Rainforest-Alliance-zertifiziert.

Original Latte

skimmed milk powder (36%), sugar, fully hydrogenated coconut oil, glucose syrup, instant coffee ((9%), maltodextrin, milk proteins, modified starch, stabilizers (e340, e452), anticaking agent (e551), salt, emulsifier (e481), flavouring, 30

FAQ

Which is healthier: Latte Karamell-Geschmack or Original Latte?

Overall, Latte Karamell-Geschmack has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Latte Karamell-Geschmack has fewer calories: 55 kcal versus 407 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Latte Karamell-Geschmack has less sugar: 8.1 g versus 40 g per 100 g.

More comparisons