Comparison

ARCTIC COFFEE carmel latte vs Original Latte

Overall, ARCTIC COFFEE carmel latte has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientARCTIC COFFEE carmel latteOriginal Latte
Nutri-Score c e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 55 kcal 407 kcal
Fat 1 g 12 g
Saturated fat 0.7 g 12 g
Sugars 7.4 g 40 g
Salt 0.2 g 1.3 g
Fiber — 2.2 g
Protein 2.8 g 15 g
Additives35
AllergensMilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • ARCTIC COFFEE carmel latte has 86% fewer calories (55 kcal vs 407 kcal).
  • ARCTIC COFFEE carmel latte has 92% less fat (1 g vs 12 g).
  • ARCTIC COFFEE carmel latte has 94% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 12 g).
  • ARCTIC COFFEE carmel latte has 82% less sugar (7.4 g vs 40 g).
  • ARCTIC COFFEE carmel latte has 84% less salt (0.2 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Original Latte has 81% more protein (15 g vs 2.8 g).
  • ARCTIC COFFEE carmel latte has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

ARCTIC COFFEE carmel latte

1% Fat MILK (76%), coffee (water, coffee powder*) (20%), sugar, stabilisers (cellulose, cellulose gum), natural flavourings, caramelised sugar powder, acidity regulator: sodium phosphates.

Original Latte

skimmed milk powder (36%), sugar, fully hydrogenated coconut oil, glucose syrup, instant coffee ((9%), maltodextrin, milk proteins, modified starch, stabilizers (e340, e452), anticaking agent (e551), salt, emulsifier (e481), flavouring, 30

FAQ

Which is healthier: ARCTIC COFFEE carmel latte or Original Latte?

Overall, ARCTIC COFFEE carmel latte has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

ARCTIC COFFEE carmel latte has fewer calories: 55 kcal versus 407 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

ARCTIC COFFEE carmel latte has less sugar: 7.4 g versus 40 g per 100 g.

More comparisons