La rose au chocolat au lait vs Roses des sables
Overall, Roses des sables has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | La rose au chocolat au lait | Roses des sables |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 515 kcal | 469 kcal |
| Fat | 26 g | 20 g |
| Saturated fat | 17 g | 12 g |
| Sugars | 30 g | 28 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | 6.9 g |
| Protein | 6.6 g | 6.8 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Roses des sables has 23% less fat (20 g vs 26 g).
- Roses des sables has 29% less saturated fat (12 g vs 17 g).
- La rose au chocolat au lait has 74% less salt (0.3 g vs 1 g).
- Roses des sables has 65% more fiber (6.9 g vs 2.4 g).
- Only La rose au chocolat au lait lists: Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
La rose au chocolat au lait
Chocolat au lait 68% (sucre, beurre de cacao, lait entier en poudre, pâte de cacao, émulsifiant lecithine de soja, arôme naturel de vanille), pétale de gië. maïs 32% (maïs, sucre, sel). Produit élaboré dans un atelier qui utilise: gluten, in fruits à coque. Chocolat au lait : 36% de cacao minimum.
Roses des sables
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: La rose au chocolat au lait or Roses des sables?
Overall, Roses des sables has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Roses des sables has fewer calories: 469 kcal versus 515 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Roses des sables has less sugar: 28 g versus 30 g per 100 g.