Kvass vs Live Kvas
Overall, Live Kvas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Kvass | Live Kvas |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 37 kcal | 28 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | — |
| Sugars | 6.7 g | 5.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.2 g | 0.4 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Live Kvas has 25% fewer calories (28 kcal vs 37 kcal).
- Live Kvas has 13% less sugar (5.8 g vs 6.7 g).
- Only Kvass lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Kvass
Water, sugar, barley malt, rye malt, glucose syrup, carbon dioxide, yeast, acid (citric acid), preservatives (potassium sorbate, sodium benzoate), hops.
Live Kvas
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kvass or Live Kvas?
Overall, Live Kvas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Live Kvas has fewer calories: 28 kcal versus 37 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Live Kvas has less sugar: 5.8 g versus 6.7 g per 100 g.