Comparison
Kvasa vs Live Kvas
Overall, Kvasa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kvasa | Live Kvas |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 18 kcal | 28 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | — |
| Sugars | 4.5 g | 5.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kvasa has 36% fewer calories (18 kcal vs 28 kcal).
- Kvasa has 22% less sugar (4.5 g vs 5.8 g).
- Live Kvas has 100% more protein (0.4 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Kvasa
Not available.
Live Kvas
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kvasa or Live Kvas?
Overall, Kvasa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kvasa has fewer calories: 18 kcal versus 28 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kvasa has less sugar: 4.5 g versus 5.8 g per 100 g.