Kwas vs Kvasa
Overall, Kvasa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kwas | Kvasa |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 29 kcal | 18 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 6.2 g | 4.5 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 6 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kvasa has 38% fewer calories (18 kcal vs 29 kcal).
- Kvasa has 27% less sugar (4.5 g vs 6.2 g).
- Only Kwas lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Kwas
Wasser, Grundstoff, Zucker, ROGGEN, GERSTENMALZ-Extrakt, Wasser, Säuerungsmittel, Milchsäure, Zucker, Kohlensäure, Kümmel, Säuerungsmittel, Citronensäure, Konservierungsstoffe, Natriumbenzoat, Kaliumsorbat, Farbstoff, Ammoniumsulfit-Zuckerkulör, Hefe
Kvasa
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kwas or Kvasa?
Overall, Kvasa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kvasa has fewer calories: 18 kcal versus 29 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kvasa has less sugar: 4.5 g versus 6.2 g per 100 g.