Comparison
Kürbiskerne vs Kürbiskerne
Overall, Kürbiskerne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kürbiskerne | Kürbiskerne |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 567 kcal | 582 kcal |
| Fat | 44 g | 46 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.9 g | 9 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 1.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Fiber | 7.6 g | 6 g |
| Protein | 35 g | 37 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kürbiskerne has 12% less saturated fat (7.9 g vs 9 g).
- Kürbiskerne has 30% less sugar (1.4 g vs 2 g).
- Kürbiskerne has 21% more fiber (7.6 g vs 6 g).
Ingredients
Kürbiskerne
Kürbiskerne. Kann Spuren von _Schalenfrüchten_ und _Erdnüssen_ enthalten.
Kürbiskerne
Kürbiskerne
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kürbiskerne or Kürbiskerne?
Overall, Kürbiskerne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kürbiskerne has fewer calories: 567 kcal versus 582 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kürbiskerne has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 2 g per 100 g.