Kruskakli vs Riccioli di crusca
Overall, Kruskakli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kruskakli | Riccioli di crusca |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 170 kcal | 315 kcal |
| Fat | 6 g | 3 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 1.5 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 50 g | 26 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Nuts, Sesame seeds, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kruskakli has 46% fewer calories (170 kcal vs 315 kcal).
- Riccioli di crusca has 50% less fat (3 g vs 6 g).
- Riccioli di crusca has 50% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Kruskakli has no salt, while Riccioli di crusca has 1 g.
- Kruskakli has 48% more fiber (50 g vs 26 g).
- Kruskakli is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Kruskakli lists: Gluten.
- Only Riccioli di crusca lists: Nuts, Sesame seeds, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Kruskakli
Vetekli
Riccioli di crusca
crusca di grano tenero 70%, farina di mais, sale marino. Prodotto in uno stabilimento che utilizza cereal contenenti glutine, soia, frutta a guscio e sesamo. Da consumarsi preferibilmente entro il: vedere data sul fondo del pacchetto.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kruskakli or Riccioli di crusca?
Overall, Kruskakli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kruskakli has fewer calories: 170 kcal versus 315 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kruskakli has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.