Kruidenboter figuur vs Kruidenboter
Overall, Kruidenboter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kruidenboter figuur | Kruidenboter |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 686 kcal | 565 kcal |
| Fat | 75.1 g | 62.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 50.3 g | 39.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 0.9 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kruidenboter has 18% fewer calories (565 kcal vs 686 kcal).
- Kruidenboter has 17% less fat (62.1 g vs 75.1 g).
- Kruidenboter has 22% less saturated fat (39.1 g vs 50.3 g).
- Kruidenboter figuur has 40% less sugar (0.6 g vs 1 g).
- Only Kruidenboter figuur lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Kruidenboter figuur
91% boter (melk), 3,5% bieslook, 3,5% peterselie, zout, 0,7% knoflook, witte peper, conserveermiddel: kaliumsorbaat.
Kruidenboter
BOTERBEREIDING, BEVAT 62% MELKVET INGREDIENTEN EX roomboter imelk, water, 27% peterselie, 2% bieslook luflodiqneder, poeder, conserveringsmiddelen EZ E ut zwarte peper, dragon cayennepeper, oregano, leriander, kenel komijn gemberpoeder, venkelzaad with peper gstextract, nootmuskaat, lavas zoethoutwortel poeder, suiker, voedingszuur (E330
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kruidenboter figuur or Kruidenboter?
Overall, Kruidenboter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kruidenboter has fewer calories: 565 kcal versus 686 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kruidenboter figuur has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 1 g per 100 g.