Comparison

Kouglof marbre au cacao maigre vs 4 kouglofs

Overall, 4 kouglofs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKouglof marbre au cacao maig...4 kouglofs
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 436 kcal 218 kcal
Fat 23 g 9.2 g
Saturated fat 2.4 g 5.8 g
Sugars 23 g 15.5 g
Salt 0.6 g 0.1 g
Protein 6.3 g 2.6 g
Additives80
AllergensEggs, Gluten, MilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • 4 kouglofs has 50% fewer calories (218 kcal vs 436 kcal).
  • 4 kouglofs has 60% less fat (9.2 g vs 23 g).
  • Kouglof marbre au cacao maigre has 59% less saturated fat (2.4 g vs 5.8 g).
  • 4 kouglofs has 33% less sugar (15.5 g vs 23 g).
  • 4 kouglofs has 77% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Kouglof marbre au cacao maigre has 59% more protein (6.3 g vs 2.6 g).
  • Only Kouglof marbre au cacao maigre lists: Eggs, Gluten, Milk.

Ingredients

Kouglof marbre au cacao maigre

Farine de blé, sucre, huile de colza, oeuf entier", humectants : glycérol, sorbitols; amidon de blé, cacao maigre en poudre 1 %, lactosérum en poudre, farine fluide (riz, ble), émulsifiants : mono - et diglycérides d'acides gras, esters de propane - 1,2-diol d'acides gras; poudres à lever : diphosphates, carbona - tes de sodium, sulfate de calcium; correcteur d'acidité : diacétate de sodium; aromes, sel, acidifiant: acide citrique. oeufs de poules élevées au sol.

4 kouglofs

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Kouglof marbre au cacao maigre or 4 kouglofs?

Overall, 4 kouglofs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

4 kouglofs has fewer calories: 218 kcal versus 436 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

4 kouglofs has less sugar: 15.5 g versus 23 g per 100 g.

More comparisons