Comparison

Kondensmilch 10% Fett vs Latte condensato

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKondensmilch 10% FettLatte condensato
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 174 kcal 322 kcal
Fat 10 g 8 g
Saturated fat 6.7 g 4.6 g
Sugars 13 g 54.9 g
Salt 0.4 g 0.2 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 7.9 g 7.5 g
Additives20
AllergensMilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kondensmilch 10% Fett has 46% fewer calories (174 kcal vs 322 kcal).
  • Latte condensato has 20% less fat (8 g vs 10 g).
  • Latte condensato has 31% less saturated fat (4.6 g vs 6.7 g).
  • Kondensmilch 10% Fett has 76% less sugar (13 g vs 54.9 g).

Ingredients

Kondensmilch 10% Fett

Milch, Stabilisatoren (Carrageen, Natriumphosphate).

Latte condensato

LATTE, Zucchero, LATTOSIO.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Kondensmilch 10% Fett or Latte condensato?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kondensmilch 10% Fett has fewer calories: 174 kcal versus 322 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kondensmilch 10% Fett has less sugar: 13 g versus 54.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons