Kombucha vs Kombucha solevita
Overall, Kombucha solevita has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kombucha | Kombucha solevita |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 29 kcal | 15 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 4 g | 1.9 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kombucha solevita has 47% fewer calories (15 kcal vs 29 kcal).
- Kombucha solevita has 53% less sugar (1.9 g vs 4 g).
- Kombucha is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Kombucha
Víz, répacukor*, fekete tea*, komló*, citromlé*, élő kombucha kultúrák*.
Kombucha solevita
95,2% kombucha (agua, azúcar, 0,5% té verde, cultivo de kombucha), 1,9% frambuesas, 1,9% arándanos, hibisco, edulcorante (glucósidos de esteviol procedentes de estevia), dióxido de carbono.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kombucha or Kombucha solevita?
Overall, Kombucha solevita has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kombucha solevita has fewer calories: 15 kcal versus 29 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kombucha solevita has less sugar: 1.9 g versus 4 g per 100 g.