Kombucha solevita vs Lipton
Overall, Lipton has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kombucha solevita | Lipton |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 15 kcal | 4 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.9 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lipton has 73% fewer calories (4 kcal vs 15 kcal).
- Lipton has 74% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.9 g).
- Lipton has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Lipton has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Kombucha solevita
95,2% kombucha (agua, azúcar, 0,5% té verde, cultivo de kombucha), 1,9% frambuesas, 1,9% arándanos, hibisco, edulcorante (glucósidos de esteviol procedentes de estevia), dióxido de carbono.
Lipton
The noir, arome, écorces de citron (2%).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kombucha solevita or Lipton?
Overall, Lipton has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lipton has fewer calories: 4 kcal versus 15 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lipton has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.9 g per 100 g.