Comparison
Kombucha vs Lipton
Overall, Lipton has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kombucha | Lipton |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 29 kcal | 4 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 4 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lipton has 86% fewer calories (4 kcal vs 29 kcal).
- Lipton has 88% less sugar (0.5 g vs 4 g).
- Lipton has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Lipton has the better Nutri-Score.
- Kombucha is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Kombucha
Víz, répacukor*, fekete tea*, komló*, citromlé*, élő kombucha kultúrák*.
Lipton
The noir, arome, écorces de citron (2%).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kombucha or Lipton?
Overall, Lipton has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lipton has fewer calories: 4 kcal versus 29 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lipton has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 4 g per 100 g.