Kombu Cha Vivo vs Petit
Overall, Kombu Cha Vivo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kombu Cha Vivo | Petit |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 24 kcal | 100 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 5.6 g | 20 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kombu Cha Vivo has 76% fewer calories (24 kcal vs 100 kcal).
- Kombu Cha Vivo has 72% less sugar (5.6 g vs 20 g).
- Kombu Cha Vivo has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Kombu Cha Vivo
Not available.
Petit
Agua potable, azúcar, jugo de piña, jugo de manzana, pulpa de ciruela, ácido cítrico (acidulcante), sabor artificial de kiwi fresa, almidón modificado, eritorbato de sodio, citrato de sodio, goma xanta, color rojo allura AC ( rojo 40).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kombu Cha Vivo or Petit?
Overall, Kombu Cha Vivo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kombu Cha Vivo has fewer calories: 24 kcal versus 100 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kombu Cha Vivo has less sugar: 5.6 g versus 20 g per 100 g.