Comparison
Aloe vera vs Kombu Cha Vivo
Overall, Kombu Cha Vivo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Aloe vera | Kombu Cha Vivo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 32 kcal | 24 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 7.9 g | 5.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kombu Cha Vivo has 25% fewer calories (24 kcal vs 32 kcal).
- Kombu Cha Vivo has 29% less sugar (5.6 g vs 7.9 g).
Ingredients
Aloe vera
Not available.
Kombu Cha Vivo
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Aloe vera or Kombu Cha Vivo?
Overall, Kombu Cha Vivo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kombu Cha Vivo has fewer calories: 24 kcal versus 32 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kombu Cha Vivo has less sugar: 5.6 g versus 7.9 g per 100 g.