Comparison

Kombu Cha Vivo vs Néctar ananás coco

Overall, Néctar ananás coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKombu Cha VivoNéctar ananás coco
Nutri-Score b b
NOVA group — 4
Calories 24 kcal 23 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 5.6 g 5 g
Salt 0 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 0 g 0.3 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Néctar ananás coco has 11% less sugar (5 g vs 5.6 g).
  • Néctar ananás coco has 100% more protein (0.3 g vs 0 g).

Ingredients

Kombu Cha Vivo

Not available.

Néctar ananás coco

Aqua, sumo de ananás par - cialmente proveniente de con - centrado 49%, água de coco 1%, acidificante (ácido cítrico), vita - mina C e edulcorante (glicosídeos de esteviol).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Kombu Cha Vivo or Néctar ananás coco?

Overall, Néctar ananás coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Néctar ananás coco has fewer calories: 23 kcal versus 24 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Néctar ananás coco has less sugar: 5 g versus 5.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons