Comparison
Kombu Cha Vivo vs Bebida Vegetal Aveia
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kombu Cha Vivo | Bebida Vegetal Aveia |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 24 kcal | 41 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 1.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 5.6 g | 3.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kombu Cha Vivo has 41% fewer calories (24 kcal vs 41 kcal).
- Kombu Cha Vivo has no fat, while Bebida Vegetal Aveia has 1.4 g.
- Bebida Vegetal Aveia has 38% less sugar (3.5 g vs 5.6 g).
- Bebida Vegetal Aveia has 100% more protein (0.7 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Kombu Cha Vivo
Not available.
Bebida Vegetal Aveia
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kombu Cha Vivo or Bebida Vegetal Aveia?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kombu Cha Vivo has fewer calories: 24 kcal versus 41 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bebida Vegetal Aveia has less sugar: 3.5 g versus 5.6 g per 100 g.