Petit vs Garrofa a la tassa
Overall, Petit has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Petit | Garrofa a la tassa |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 100 kcal | 457 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 19.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 12.5 g |
| Sugars | 20 g | 55.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 7.8 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 1.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Petit has 78% fewer calories (100 kcal vs 457 kcal).
- Petit has no fat, while Garrofa a la tassa has 19.8 g.
- Petit has no saturated fat, while Garrofa a la tassa has 12.5 g.
- Petit has 64% less sugar (20 g vs 55.3 g).
- Garrofa a la tassa has 100% more fiber (7.8 g vs 0 g).
- Garrofa a la tassa has 100% more protein (1.6 g vs 0 g).
- Petit has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Petit
Agua potable, azúcar, jugo de piña, jugo de manzana, pulpa de ciruela, ácido cítrico (acidulcante), sabor artificial de kiwi fresa, almidón modificado, eritorbato de sodio, citrato de sodio, goma xanta, color rojo allura AC ( rojo 40).
Garrofa a la tassa
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Petit or Garrofa a la tassa?
Overall, Petit has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Petit has fewer calories: 100 kcal versus 457 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Petit has less sugar: 20 g versus 55.3 g per 100 g.