Comparison

Kirschtomatensauce vs Alnatura Bio Tomatensauce Kräuter

Overall, Kirschtomatensauce has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKirschtomatensauceAlnatura Bio Tomatensauce Kr...
Nutri-Score a c
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 43 kcal 71 kcal
Fat 0.7 g 3.9 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.6 g
Sugars 6.9 g 6.4 g
Salt 0.5 g 1.4 g
Fiber 1.2 g 1.1 g
Protein 1.3 g 1.4 g
Additives00
AllergensCeleryNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kirschtomatensauce has 39% fewer calories (43 kcal vs 71 kcal).
  • Kirschtomatensauce has 82% less fat (0.7 g vs 3.9 g).
  • Kirschtomatensauce has no saturated fat, while Alnatura Bio Tomatensauce Kräuter has 0.6 g.
  • Kirschtomatensauce has 66% less salt (0.5 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Kirschtomatensauce has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Kirschtomatensauce lists: Celery.

Ingredients

Kirschtomatensauce

Passierte Tomaten 97%, natives Olivenöl extra, Speisesalz, Karotten, Zwiebeln, Sellerie, Basilikum, Zucker.

Alnatura Bio Tomatensauce Kräuter

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Kirschtomatensauce or Alnatura Bio Tomatensauce Kräuter?

Overall, Kirschtomatensauce has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kirschtomatensauce has fewer calories: 43 kcal versus 71 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Alnatura Bio Tomatensauce Kräuter has less sugar: 6.4 g versus 6.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons