Kirschen in Zartbitterschokolade vs Amarene al cioccolato
Overall, Amarene al cioccolato has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kirschen in Zartbitterschoko... | Amarene al cioccolato |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 533 kcal | 416 kcal |
| Fat | 35 g | 16.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 21 g | 10 g |
| Sugars | 38 g | 62 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 9.3 g | — |
| Protein | 6 g | 3.1 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Amarene al cioccolato has 22% fewer calories (416 kcal vs 533 kcal).
- Amarene al cioccolato has 53% less fat (16.6 g vs 35 g).
- Amarene al cioccolato has 52% less saturated fat (10 g vs 21 g).
- Kirschen in Zartbitterschokolade has 39% less sugar (38 g vs 62 g).
- Kirschen in Zartbitterschokolade has 48% more protein (6 g vs 3.1 g).
- Only Kirschen in Zartbitterschokolade lists: Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Kirschen in Zartbitterschokolade
90% Zartbitterschokolade* (Kakaomasse*, Rohrzucker*, Kakao - butter, Kakaopulver* stark entölt, Emulgator: Lecithin (SOJALECITHIN*)), 8% Sauerkirschen*, Überzugsmittel: Gummi arabicum*; Zucker*, Dextrose
Amarene al cioccolato
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kirschen in Zartbitterschokolade or Amarene al cioccolato?
Overall, Amarene al cioccolato has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Amarene al cioccolato has fewer calories: 416 kcal versus 533 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kirschen in Zartbitterschokolade has less sugar: 38 g versus 62 g per 100 g.