Comparison

King Kebab vs Kebab de pollo

Overall, King Kebab has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKing KebabKebab de pollo
Nutri-Score a d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 183 kcal 201 kcal
Fat 8 g 13.1 g
Saturated fat 2.3 g 4.3 g
Sugars 2.6 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.7 g 2.2 g
Fiber 1.3 g 0 g
Protein 24.3 g 22 g
Additives41
AllergensMilkSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • King Kebab has 39% less fat (8 g vs 13.1 g).
  • King Kebab has 46% less saturated fat (2.3 g vs 4.3 g).
  • Kebab de pollo has 81% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2.6 g).
  • King Kebab has 70% less salt (0.7 g vs 2.2 g).
  • King Kebab has 100% more fiber (1.3 g vs 0 g).
  • King Kebab has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only King Kebab lists: Milk.
  • Only Kebab de pollo lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

King Kebab

89% Chicken Leg Pieces, Water, Sugar, Spices (Coriander Powder, Cumin Powder, Turmeric, Cayenne Pepper, Ginger Powder, Fenugreek, Cinnamon Powder, Clove Powder), Dried Glucose Syrup, Milk Powder, Cornflour, Salt, Garlic Powder, Tomato Powder, Onion Powder, Yeast Extract, Coriander Leaf, Acid: Citric Acid; Thickener: Guar Gum; Colour: Paprika Extract; Turmeric Extract, Sunflower Oil.

Kebab de pollo

Carne de pollo (86%); Agua; Aglutinante (proteína de SOJA, estabilizador (E-450) y harina de patata); Sal; Especias y extracto de especias, jarabe de glucosa, azúcar, aromas, hierbas y tomate; Extracto de levadura y maltodextrina.

FAQ

Which is healthier: King Kebab or Kebab de pollo?

Overall, King Kebab has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

King Kebab has fewer calories: 183 kcal versus 201 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kebab de pollo has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons