Comparison

King Kebab vs Klassisk Kebab!

Overall, King Kebab has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKing KebabKlassisk Kebab!
Nutri-Score a d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 183 kcal 306 kcal
Fat 8 g 24 g
Saturated fat 2.3 g 11 g
Sugars 2.6 g 0.9 g
Salt 0.7 g 0 g
Fiber 1.3 g —
Protein 24.3 g 14 g
Additives42
AllergensMilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • King Kebab has 40% fewer calories (183 kcal vs 306 kcal).
  • King Kebab has 67% less fat (8 g vs 24 g).
  • King Kebab has 79% less saturated fat (2.3 g vs 11 g).
  • Klassisk Kebab! has 65% less sugar (0.9 g vs 2.6 g).
  • Klassisk Kebab! has 98% less salt (0 g vs 0.7 g).
  • King Kebab has 42% more protein (24.3 g vs 14 g).
  • King Kebab has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only King Kebab lists: Milk.

Ingredients

King Kebab

89% Chicken Leg Pieces, Water, Sugar, Spices (Coriander Powder, Cumin Powder, Turmeric, Cayenne Pepper, Ginger Powder, Fenugreek, Cinnamon Powder, Clove Powder), Dried Glucose Syrup, Milk Powder, Cornflour, Salt, Garlic Powder, Tomato Powder, Onion Powder, Yeast Extract, Coriander Leaf, Acid: Citric Acid; Thickener: Guar Gum; Colour: Paprika Extract; Turmeric Extract, Sunflower Oil.

Klassisk Kebab!

Nötkött (82 %)*, nötfett, vatten, salt, potatisfiber, lökpulver, naturliga aromer, stabiliseringsmedel (E450, E451), animaliskt protein av nöt, kryddor, druvsocker, socker, vitlök. *Ursprung: Sverige

FAQ

Which is healthier: King Kebab or Klassisk Kebab!?

Overall, King Kebab has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

King Kebab has fewer calories: 183 kcal versus 306 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Klassisk Kebab! has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 2.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons