Katsu rice noodles cup vs Nudeln aus Naturreis
Overall, Nudeln aus Naturreis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Katsu rice noodles cup | Nudeln aus Naturreis |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 338 kcal | 346 kcal |
| Fat | 2.5 g | 2.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 7 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 2.7 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 7 g | 8.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Mustard, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nudeln aus Naturreis has 13% less fat (2.2 g vs 2.5 g).
- Nudeln aus Naturreis has 87% less sugar (0.9 g vs 7 g).
- Nudeln aus Naturreis has 96% less salt (0.1 g vs 2.7 g).
- Katsu rice noodles cup has 59% more fiber (2.5 g vs 1 g).
- Nudeln aus Naturreis has 22% more protein (8.9 g vs 7 g).
- Only Katsu rice noodles cup lists: Mustard, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Katsu rice noodles cup
Rice noodles (63%) (rice, tapioca starch, salt), broth paste (35%) (miso (water, soya beans, rice, salt), water, sugar, tamari soy sauce (water, soya beans, salt, alcoholl, rice bran oil salt, alcohol, yeast extract, curry powder (contains mustard (2% spices, paprika, garlic powder, onion powder, ginger powder, coriander), dried spring onion. Allergy advice:
Nudeln aus Naturreis
Vollkornreis* (50%), Reis* (30%), Reiskleie* (15%), Tapiocastärke*.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Katsu rice noodles cup or Nudeln aus Naturreis?
Overall, Nudeln aus Naturreis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Katsu rice noodles cup has fewer calories: 338 kcal versus 346 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nudeln aus Naturreis has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 7 g per 100 g.