Kania Ajvar mild vs Ajvar scharf
Overall, Ajvar scharf has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kania Ajvar mild | Ajvar scharf |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 95 kcal | 78 kcal |
| Fat | 4.6 g | 4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 7.6 g | 8 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | 29.6 g | 2.9 g |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 1.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ajvar scharf has 18% fewer calories (78 kcal vs 95 kcal).
- Ajvar scharf has 13% less fat (4 g vs 4.6 g).
- Ajvar scharf has 50% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 0.6 g).
- Kania Ajvar mild has 90% more fiber (29.6 g vs 2.9 g).
- Ajvar scharf has 20% more protein (1.5 g vs 1.2 g).
Ingredients
Kania Ajvar mild
paprika 84.5%, eggplant 8%, sunflower oil, sugar, sea salt, garlic, chili, acid (acetic acid),
Ajvar scharf
Rote Paprika 76%, Aubergine 12%, Sonnenblumenöl, Branntweinessig, Tomatenkonzentrat 2,6%, jodiertes Speisesalz (Speisesalz, Kaliumjodat), scharfe Pfefferoni 1%, Zucker, Gewürze.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kania Ajvar mild or Ajvar scharf?
Overall, Ajvar scharf has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ajvar scharf has fewer calories: 78 kcal versus 95 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kania Ajvar mild has less sugar: 7.6 g versus 8 g per 100 g.