Comparison

Kalamata Olive Tapenade vs Tartinade Paprika Chili

Overall, Kalamata Olive Tapenade has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKalamata Olive TapenadeTartinade Paprika Chili
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 242 kcal 361 kcal
Fat 24.8 g 36 g
Saturated fat 3 g 3.2 g
Sugars 0.5 g 1.4 g
Salt 1.8 g 1.5 g
Fiber 5.5 g 2.9 g
Protein 2 g 4.9 g
Additives20
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kalamata Olive Tapenade has 33% fewer calories (242 kcal vs 361 kcal).
  • Kalamata Olive Tapenade has 31% less fat (24.8 g vs 36 g).
  • Kalamata Olive Tapenade has 64% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Tartinade Paprika Chili has 17% less salt (1.5 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Kalamata Olive Tapenade has 48% more fiber (5.5 g vs 2.9 g).
  • Tartinade Paprika Chili has 59% more protein (4.9 g vs 2 g).
  • Kalamata Olive Tapenade has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Kalamata Olive Tapenade is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Kalamata Olive Tapenade

Kalamata Olives (79%), Extra Virgin Olive Oil, Sundried Tomatoes (4%), Garlic, Capers (3%), Salt, Garlic Powder, Cumin, Acidity Regulators: Citric Acid, Lactic Acid.

Tartinade Paprika Chili

Poivron rouge 36 % , huile de colza*, graines de tournesol*, concentré de tomates*, jus de citron*, vinaigre de cidre*, sel, arome naturel 0,3% (chili). *ingrédients biologiques

FAQ

Which is healthier: Kalamata Olive Tapenade or Tartinade Paprika Chili?

Overall, Kalamata Olive Tapenade has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kalamata Olive Tapenade has fewer calories: 242 kcal versus 361 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kalamata Olive Tapenade has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons