Comparison
Kajmak vs Kaymak
Overall, Kaymak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kajmak | Kaymak |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 449 kcal | 239 kcal |
| Fat | 45 g | 22.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 32 g | 15.1 g |
| Sugars | 5 g | 3 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 6 g | 6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kaymak has 47% fewer calories (239 kcal vs 449 kcal).
- Kaymak has 50% less fat (22.5 g vs 45 g).
- Kaymak has 53% less saturated fat (15.1 g vs 32 g).
- Kaymak has 40% less sugar (3 g vs 5 g).
- Kaymak has 43% less salt (0.7 g vs 1.2 g).
- Kaymak has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Kaymak lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Kajmak
Not available.
Kaymak
Pasteurized cream, Pasteurized cow's milk, Table salt, Lactic acid cultures
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kajmak or Kaymak?
Overall, Kaymak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kaymak has fewer calories: 239 kcal versus 449 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kaymak has less sugar: 3 g versus 5 g per 100 g.